ATs,德州第一天牌
ATs,Ace Ten suited,从某种意义上讲,是德州最牛的起手牌。它是造nuts能力最强的牌。为了说明这一点,先把nuts定义统一一下。nuts定义有很多,这里的定义如下:对手不能超过你,只能输给你或跟你打平,这样的牌就叫做nuts。比如,在AAK83牌面上,AA当然是nuts。AK也是。你有AK,别人就不可能有AA,它只能有另一个AK跟你打平。再比如,Kstatic/image/smiley/poker/spade.gif8static/image/smiley/poker/heart.gif
7static/image/smiley/poker/heart.gif
6static/image/smiley/poker/heart.gif
5static/image/smiley/poker/heart.gif
牌面,9static/image/smiley/poker/heart.gif
9static/image/smiley/poker/diamond.gif
就是nuts。因为再无人能有Tstatic/image/smiley/poker/heart.gif
9static/image/smiley/poker/heart.gif
昨天计算了一下,ATs到河牌的造nuts概率是4.34%,位居所有牌之首造nuts能力前20强:排名底牌到河牌造nuts概率%1ATs4.342AJs4.243AQs4.144AKs4.085A9s3.536A6s3.417JTs3.408A8s3.359A7s3.3110A5s3.2511JTo3.2412A4s3.0913KQs3.0314QJs3.0015KJs2.9816QTs2.9517A3s2.9418KTs2.9319A2s2.7720QJo2.75 第六名a6x很醒目 Tamarin 发表于 2015-8-10 09:45第六名a6x很醒目谢谢指出,赶紧改了笔误原因是我的软件不认“A6s”这样的说法,如果写上去,它会把s当作黑桃,认为是任意一个A + 黑桃6。软件认可的写法是Ax6x,抹掉一个x后,忘了把后面的x改成s 为什么ATs比AKs造nuts能力显著高出一些?(4.08% vs 4.34%)我想半天,还真想不出有哪些AKs是nuts,而ATs不是的场合。后来经陈爷点拨,他指出两点:1. 单张straightflush的情况。AKs没有单张straightflush,凡是形成straight flush必然两张都用上。ATs则可以牌面含同花的6789、789J、89JQ等三种情况,它都是nuts2. A-hi flush的情况。AKs在做成A-hi flush时,牌面比较容易allow straight flush。比如牌面有同花的J98\Q98\T86等而ATs,必须牌面最大牌是9以下,才会出现这种情况,比如987、865AJs AQs也同理可解释 最弱的造nuts能力62o,到河底有0.13% 的概率是nuts 只能靠四条在造nuts的领域62o比72o还要稍微差那么一点点,72o也是0.13%,但更小的位数上可以胜出。 Howard 发表于 2015-8-11 04:33谢谢指出,赶紧改了笔误原因是我的软件不认“A6s”这样的说法,如果写上去,它会把s当作黑桃,认为是任 ...我同时感觉a8s应该比a6s强,也许感觉错了 Howard 发表于 2015-8-11 04:41为什么ATs比AKs造nuts能力显著高出一些?(4.08% vs 4.34%)我想半天,还真想不出有哪些AKs是nuts,而ATs ...逻辑上来说,这个说明还不充分。存在一些AKs是nuts但ATs不是nuts的牌型,比如,在 AAK(AAT)xx的board,xx只要不是对子,牌面没有同花顺可能的话,AKs就是nuts,但ATs要成为nuts,除了上面两个条件外,还必须xx都不大于T。所以,严格上来说,要说明ATs造nuts能力强于AKs,需要说明上文的情况比你的回复帖中的情况,数量要少。鸡蛋里面挑骨头。 造nuts能力完全排名:1AxTx4.32%2AxJx4.23%3AxQx4.14%4AxKx4.09%5Ax9x3.54%6Ax6x3.45%7JxTx3.37%8Ax8x3.34%9Ax7x3.32%10Ax5x3.26%11JyTx3.25%12Ax4x3.11%13KxQx3.03%14QxJx2.99%15KxJx2.98%16KxTx2.94%17QxTx2.94%18Ax3x2.94%19Ax2x2.79%20QyJx2.73%21QyTx2.69%22KyQx2.33%23Tx9x2.23%24KyJx2.22%25KyTx2.18%26Ty9x2.06%27AyKx1.98%28AyAx1.95%29AyQx1.87%30AyJx1.78%319x8x1.76%32KyKx1.75%338x7x1.72%34AyTx1.72%357x6x1.70%366x5x1.66%37Jx9x1.63%389y8x1.60%39Tx8x1.58%408y7x1.58%417y6x1.56%426y5x1.55%43Jy9x1.51%445x4x1.49%45Ty8x1.46%46Kx9x1.42%47Kx5x1.37%485y4x1.36%49Kx4x1.33%50Kx3x1.32%51Kx2x1.31%52Kx8x1.29%539x7x1.28%548x6x1.27%55Kx7x1.26%56QyQx1.24%577x5x1.24%586x4x1.24%59Kx6x1.23%60Qx9x1.23%619y7x1.16%628y6x1.13%637y5x1.12%646y4x1.09%655x3x1.05%66Jx8x1.00%67JyJx0.99%68Qy9x0.97%69TyTx0.94%705y3x0.93%71Tx7x0.92%72Jy8x0.91%734x3x0.85%74Ty7x0.84%754y3x0.75%76Ay9x0.75%779y9x0.72%788y8x0.72%79Qx8x0.71%80Ay8x0.71%819x6x0.70%827y7x0.69%83Ay7x0.69%846y6x0.68%858x5x0.68%863y3x0.67%874y4x0.67%885y5x0.67%897x4x0.66%90Ay6x0.66%916x3x0.65%922y2x0.65%93Qx7x0.63%94Ky9x0.62%95Ay4x0.62%96Ay5x0.62%97Ay3x0.61%989y6x0.60%99Ay2x0.60%100Qx6x0.60%101Qx5x0.59%1028y5x0.59%103Ky8x0.57%104Qx3x0.57%105Qx4x0.57%106Qx2x0.56%1076y3x0.56%1087y4x0.55%109Ky7x0.55%110Qy8x0.51%111Ky6x0.51%112Jx7x0.51%1135x2x0.49%114Ky5x0.48%115Qy7x0.48%116Ky4x0.47%117Ky2x0.46%118Ky3x0.46%1194x2x0.45%120Tx6x0.44%121Jy7x0.44%122Jx6x0.44%123Qy6x0.44%124Qy5x0.42%125Jx5x0.41%126Ty6x0.41%127Qy4x0.40%128Qy3x0.40%129Jy6x0.39%1305y2x0.39%131Qy2x0.39%132Jy5x0.39%133Jx4x0.39%134Tx5x0.38%135Ty5x0.38%136Jx3x0.38%137Jx2x0.38%138Jy2x0.37%139Jy4x0.37%140Tx4x0.36%1414y2x0.36%142Tx3x0.36%143Ty4x0.36%144Jy3x0.36%145Ty2x0.35%146Ty3x0.34%147Tx2x0.34%1483x2x0.28%1493y2x0.24%1509x5x0.19%1518x4x0.19%1527x3x0.18%1536x2x0.18%1549y5x0.17%1558y4x0.15%1569x4x0.15%1579y4x0.15%1588y3x0.14%1599x3x0.14%1608x3x0.14%1617y3x0.13%1629x2x0.13%1639y3x0.13%1647y2x0.13%1656y2x0.13%1668x2x0.13%1678y2x0.13%1687x2x0.13%1699y2x0.12% dengxianqi 发表于 2015-8-10 19:21逻辑上来说,这个说明还不充分。存在一些AKs是nuts但ATs不是nuts的牌型,比如,在 AAK(AAT)xx的boar ...定性准确,我的说法是既不必要也不充分。只是给出了一种可能的原因 好文。。谢谢。。。涨知识了~
頁:
[1]